Image: Sandisk Sansa m250 digital audio player review
Similar articles
Reviews section
ADVERTISEMENT
Reviews Disclaimer
Readers are reminded that the opinions expressed, and the results published in connection with reviews and/or laboratory test reports carried out on computing systems and/or related items are confined to, and representative of, only those goods supplied and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase.

Review: Sandisk Sansa M250 digital audio player

A good value player, but with questionable aesthetics

What is this?
Price: £98 (2GB); £65 (1GB)
Manufacturer: Sandisk
Technical specifications



Ratings
Overall rating: Overall rating
Features: Features
Ease of use: Ease of use
Value for money: Value for money
Rate this product
Verdict

Pros: Small and light; supports DRM wma files; good value
Cons: Small screen; unattractive design; no radio
Overall: If you can overlook the dubious design, it's actually a good value player


Luke Peters, Personal Computer World 06 Apr 2006

ADVERTISEMENT

With the trio of Apple, Sony and Creative commanding such an enormous share of the digital audio player market, it's amazing that smaller manufacturers still continue to churn out their own take on the genre.

If these lesser-known devices are to have any chance of winning the battle for the customer pound, they need to offer something slightly different to their more established competitors.

While the Sandisk Sansa m250 offers good value, we're not convinced it's good enough to lure people away from an Ipod Nano or feature-packed Creative Muvo v200, for instance.

It's a 2GB player (a 1GB model is also available) that will play mp3, wma and Audible music files. It also boasts Microsoft's Plays For Sure logo, which means it will have no problem with music downloaded from Napster or any other site that uses DRM-encrypted wma files.

You also get a built-in microphone for voice recording and an impressive battery life that ran for around 11 hours on one AAA battery.

Once the accompanying USB lead is attached, transferring music is done within Windows Media Player or by simply dragging and dropping files into the player's directory,

It's very small (7.5cm long, 3.5cm wide), lighter than an Ipod Nano and comes with a carry case and armband.

Music quality is good too - easily comparable to bigger-name offerings. The menu system is intuitive and sorts by artist, song or album based on ID3 tags, but it's nowhere near as slick as its competitors.

There's no scroll mechanism for fast track navigation, for example.

Downsides include the small screen, which can't always display the amount of information required, and the achingly slow scroll speed.

It also lacks an automatic pause feature if the headphones are accidentally unplugged and, while our American friends can revel in the joy of FM radio, the tuner feature is disabled here in Europe.

The supplied headphones are atrocious too and the plastic casing feels very breakable.

In all, it's a nifty little player that offers good value for money, but it lacks certain features and is just not as aesthetically appealing as many other players.

See also:

A low-cost flash-based mp3 player  18 Jan 2006
Buyers' Guide: Portable Media PlayersThe latest must-have gadget comes in many forms. We show you what to look for  04 Jan 2006
Buyers' Guide: Digital Music PlayerDigital music players come in various guises, and it's not always easy to know the differences. We explain the main types of player.  15 Feb 2006
Small and light, but it has fiddly controls and a high price  30 Dec 2005
Not only stylish, but also the world's smallest mp3 player  20 Dec 2005
Fifth generation Ipod with video, but not one for movies  20 Oct 2005
The Ipod’s competition launches a new challenge  10 Oct 2005

All MP3 Players

Like this story? Spread the news by clicking below:

Post this to Delicious del.icio.us    Post this to Digg Digg this    Post this to reddit reddit!

Permalink for this story

R E A D E R   R E V I E W S
M A R K E T P L A C E
Sponsored links